From time to time I have come across or been sent some incredible writings, poems, etc. that just beg for publication. I have collected some of these and have published them here for your enjoyment. Some have been written by friends and others by strangers, but in all cases they are worthy of learning.
If you have a favorite monologue or poem that you think would fit in here please send it to me for my review and I may include it.
This page is fairly long so you might want to print it out. Other than the public domain works all of these works are copyrighted by the author
| On Defense | Concord Hymn | Dane-geld | Privacy | The Lure of the Tropics | The Bequest | Ode to the Rifle |
| The Quest | The Quitter | Grandpa's Lesson | Walking Rifleman | Tribute 1998 | The Flag | Hold! |
| The Ghost From Valley Forge | Why? | The Gods of the Copybook | Cooper vs. Terrorism |
| A Nation of Cowards | Samurai | Freedom Flies In Your heart Like An Eagle | A Hunter's Half-life |
| Thomas Moore | Ode to the Media | The Goblin and the Raven | What I Have Learned From The Twentieth Century |
| The Parable of the Sheep | Integrity | The Monsters and the Weak | I Will Fight |
| The Old Man Next Door | A Civilized Act |
|
Learning to Shoot To the tune of the Pink Floyd song "Learning to Fly" Verse This fatal attraction is holding me fast, Chorus Verse A soul in tension, committed to this shot Chorus Instrumental with background noise of a rifle range
(e.g.. "Shooter this is Verse An X unveiled by the morning light, Chorus |
|
On Defense "Demons who enter your circle must be pushed out "No matter what world you walk in--office, school, temple, prison, or the streets--there is an underworld populated with demons. These are people who are avaricious, aggressive, sadistic, and cynical. They not only take advantage of others without compunction, they delight in it. They find pleasure in seeing others suffer. "The why of it cannot be answered. There is only the fact, with no metaphysical meaning or other ramifications. It is not karma, it is not fate. If these people decide to attack you, it is circumstance. You must fight or be mowed down. "Compassion and humility may be among the most treasured of human virtues, but they are not useful in conflict. A beautiful gold statue of your most adored god is a treasure, but you would not use it as a weapon. Virtue is to be valued in the proper context; only a sword will do in battle. "Whether an attack is physical--assault, rape, murder--or whether it is mental--business intrigues, emotional abuse--you must be prepared. It is best to prepare for conflict by learning as much self-defense as possible. You will not become a bully or a monster, but instead, you will learn that you can respond to any situation. If you are never attacked, that will be wonderful. Training will still help you work out your fears, inhibitions, and anxieties. In the case of conflict, no one, not even a veteran, is ever sure that they will come out alive from a confrontation. but they resolve to go in there and give themselves a fighting chance. This in itself is a triumph over evil." With thanks to Ric Wyckoff |
|
Concord
Hymn By the rude bridge that arched
the flood, The foe long since in silence
slept; On this green bank, by this
soft stream, Spirit, that made those heroes
dare
|
|
Dane-geld It is always a temptation to an armed and agile
nation, And that is called asking for Dane-geld, It is always a temptation to a rich and lazy nation, And that is called paying the Dane-geld; It is wrong to put temptation in the path of any
nation, "We never pay any-one Dane-geld, |
|
The Eternal Value of Privacy The most common retort against privacy advocates -- by those in favor of ID checks, cameras, databases, data mining and other wholesale surveillance measures -- is this line "If you aren't doing anything wrong, what do you have to hide?" Some clever answers: "If I'm not doing anything wrong, then you have no cause to watch me." "Because the government gets to define what's wrong, and they keep changing the definition." "Because you might do something wrong with my information." My problem with quips like these -- as right as they are -- is that they accept the premise that privacy is about hiding a wrong. It's not. Privacy is an inherent human right, and a requirement for maintaining the human condition with dignity and respect. Two proverbs say it best "Quis custodiet custodes ipsos?" ("Who watches the watchers?") and "Absolute power corrupts absolutely." Cardinal Richelieu understood the value of surveillance when he famously said, "If one would give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest man, I would find something in them to have him hanged." Watch someone long enough, and you'll find something to arrest--or just blackmail--with. Privacy is important because without it, surveillance information will be abused to peep, to sell to marketers and to spy on political enemies--whoever they happen to be at the time. Privacy protects us from abuses by those in power, even if we're doing nothing wrong at the time of surveillance. We do nothing wrong when we make love or go to the bathroom. We are not deliberately hiding anything when we seek out private places for reflection or conversation. We keep private journals, sing in the privacy of the shower, and write letters to secret lovers and then burn them. Privacy is a basic human need. A future in which privacy would face constant assault was so alien to the framers of the Constitution that it never occurred to them to call out privacy as an explicit right. Privacy was inherent to the nobility of their being and their cause. Of course being watched in your own home was unreasonable. Watching at all was an act so unseemly as to be inconceivable among gentlemen in their day. You watched convicted criminals, not free citizens. You ruled your own home. It's intrinsic to the concept of liberty. For if we are observed in all matters, we are constantly under threat of correction, judgment, criticism, even plagiarism of our own uniqueness. We become children, fettered under watchful eyes, constantly fearful that--either now or in the uncertain future -- patterns we leave behind will be brought back to implicate us, by whatever authority has now become focused upon our once-private and innocent acts. We lose our individuality, because everything we do is observable and recordable. How many of us have paused during conversation in the past four-and-a-half years, suddenly aware that we might be eavesdropped on? Probably it was a phone conversation, although maybe it was an e-mail or instant-message exchange or a conversation in a public place. Maybe the topic was terrorism, or politics, or Islam. We stop suddenly, momentarily afraid that our words might be taken out of context, then we laugh at our paranoia and go on. But our demeanor has changed, and our words are subtly altered. This is the loss of freedom we face when our privacy is taken from us. This is life in former East Germany, or life in Saddam Hussein's Iraq. And it's our future as we allow an ever-intrusive eye into our personal, private lives. Too many wrongly characterize the debate as "security versus privacy." The real choice is liberty versus control. Tyranny, whether it arises under threat of foreign physical attack or under constant domestic authoritative scrutiny, is still tyranny. Liberty requires security without intrusion, security plus privacy. Widespread police surveillance is the very definition of a police state. And that's why we should champion privacy even when we have nothing to hide. Bruce Schneier is the CTO
of Counterpane Internet Security (www.counterpane.com)
and the author of |
|
The Bequest Most ways, I would say, my father did well So I hate to admit it, but in one way he failed me Had the Guru not told us what the best rifle is, As my dad did not have one, I had to go out Then I thought about fathers and how we have more I thought of our fathers who lived life as hunters How they must have dreamed of a weapon to reach, In my veins still runs the hunters’ blood And I thought of our fathers who settled the land, They lived under threat from savage men How our fathers must have yearned for a weapon This will to be able to stand my ground And I thought of those whose strong, striving minds Through the genius of these, our fathers, And there’s another set of fathers They knew that their Republic It was their will that we should all For more than half my life now, Now I’m a father and one day plan But I think that now I understand And for all I know it may well be If so, I say, let him sell it off
|
|
OLYMPEION You hold in your hands the bow of Diana, Your rifle embodies the gift of Hephaistos, Bare-handed you live at the mercy of numbers, Vulcan has given you means to establish |
Jim Crews is an instructor of weaponry of the first class and is always ready to examine new ideas, learn from them, and apply what is learned--something we should all do.
|
The Quest It should never end. |
The Quitter
|
| "Grandpa's Lesson."
Pappy took to drinkin' back when I was barely three. I learned a heap 'o lessons from the yarns he liked to tell. But there ain't many troubles that a man caint fix Grandpa courted Grandma near the town of old Cheyenne. Her daddy softened up when Grandpa said that he could fix Grandpa herded cattle down around Jalisco way. Didn't take much doin' 'cept a couple special tricks Then there was that Faro game near San Francisco Bay. Those others were professionals and they don't play for kicks. He begged some woolen trousers off the local storekeep there He left one bleedin' badly and another mostly lame. Grandpa's slowin' down a bit and just the other night I'll bet this here old rifle and this honest money too But.....ain't many troubles that a man caint fix Lindy Cooper Wisdom |
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed, from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -- Thomas Jefferson
Walking Rifleman When a man takes his rifle awalkin' |
Written for Col. Jeff Cooper and first recited in Botswana on the occasion of his 79th birthday. It's about the mindset the author learned from him; hence the title.
Okavango Birthday Tribute 1998 History makes this lesson quite plain; When the Israelites cowered and hid in their holes, When the founders grew tired of the greed of the king, When Theodore Roosevelt led his men up San Juan, It's really just silly, this "New Age" idea If a goblin assaults you on the streets of your town, Joe Sledge |
|
Ladies and gentlemen. I give you the flag |
Essential to the defense of freedom is the absolute resistance of tyranny. If tyrants know we will fight to the death in our defense of our Constitutionally affirmed God-given rights then we may continue to enjoy peace, for they know that even if they kill us all they will have lost more than they could possibly have gained.
Churchill spoke the truth when he said: "Still if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves."
My family will never be disarmed. We will never be loaded passively on the cattle cars to be hauled away to the camps. We are God's children and we will go home to Him before we submit to the murderers and rapists who people this government. This spirit of absolute resistance is what enabled Switzerland to survive during WWII when every republic in Europe was consumed by the Reich.
I pray that the hearts of all are moved to greater resolve by the following words:
"Everywhere, where the order is to hold, it is the duty of conscience of each fighter, even if he depends on himself alone, to fight at his assigned position. The riflemen, if overtaken or surrounded, fight in their position until no more ammunition exists. Then cold steel is next.... The machine-gunners, the cannoneers of heavy weapons, the artillerymen, if in the bunker or on the field, do not abandon or destroy their weapons, or allow the enemy to seize them. The crews fight further like riflemen. As long as a man has another cartridge or hand weapons to use, he does not yield." -- General Henri Guisan Commander In Chief of the Swiss militia during WWII, From "Target Switzerland" by Halbrook
Our duty is to hold the position.
Tom Russell
The Ghost From Valley Forge I had a dream the other night I didn't understand, Author Unknown |
Note, just substitute names from the current administration for Justinian and crew and you will be able to see the WHY of things as they are at the present.
§
The West had long been preparing to receive them, too. Generations of fighting against Alans, Gepids, Goths, and Huns, and of fighting with them shoulder to shoulder, in alliance now with one and now with the other, had transformed the Roman military state into the thing it had been fighting. Narses consciously and successfully employed not Roman but Hunnish tactics against the Franks, and the closing chapters of Jordanes show a Roman army indistinguishable from any barbarian horde. The last chapter of all makes the significant remark that the ultimate victor to emerge from the world shambles was "victor gentium diversarum Justinianus Imperator" (the Emperor Justinian, conqueror of diverse peoples). It was in this man Justinian that the Huns won a great and abiding victory over the West.
The Emperor Justinian displayed at all times a single-minded devotion to the Huns that puzzles and dismays historians. Apparently there was nothing he would not do to please the Huns, even to the wrecking of his own foreign policyand the ruination of trade and agriculture throughout the empire. A passionate devotee of the factionists, he had worn their Persian beards, Hunnish hairdo, Hunnish cloaks, Hunnish shirts, and Hunnish shoes,the girdles and brooches of the steppes having already supplanted the more civilized styles of the West."The greatest destroyer of established institutions that ever lived," Justinian was determined to make the Western world "completely change its clothes" and he succeeded.
All the absurdities and contradictions in his policies vanish if we consider that this Illyrian, who hated Greek things, was set upon becoming a grand khan. Justinian handed over the wealth of the state to the Huns "who were always turning up" at court (a significant note) in ever increasing numbers. He would claim for himself all the private property of the citizens, either charging the Romans with a crime or pretending that it was all being brought in to him as gifts, and then promptly give it all away again to the Hunnish lords before his throne: a thing that made perfectly good sense to his visitors from the steppes but appeared to his Roman subjects as "a thing that had never happened since the beginning of time." What he did not thus throw away to the barbarians, says Procopius, he wasted on absurd buildings, constructed simply to outshine all other emperorsa thing that any khan would have understood. This Hun-worship actually amounted to the enslaving of the empire, says Procopius and Agathias, but that was how Justinian wanted it. He insisted that all his subjects, from top to bottom, be called his slaves, and instituted the strictly Central Asiatic style of prostration and foot-kissing. He was not averse to giving the impression of being a sort of super-shaman and apparently even adopted the well-known Mongol custom of making those who entered his presence step clear of the threshold. In short, "instead of acting like a Roman Emperor, he was the complete barbarian in language, dress, and thought. "What more could one ask? The welcome barbarians poured into court from all directions, to the immense delight of the emperor, who never failed to send them away loaded with gold,till presently "the barbarians in general became complete masters of the wealth of the Romans. "In the end, all the offices and officials of the state were supplanted by one officethe royal court, and by two personsthe emperor and empress, for the new ascendancy of the empress, intensely resented by Procopius, was the crowning Asiatic touch.
Justinian's weird innovations were no ephemeral thing. They were but the culmination of that process of Asianizing which had been deplored by the poets of the Republic. And they were there to stay...
From, The Ancient State, p. 127 - 128, By Hugh Nibley
This from Kipling speaks to us across the ages--80 years downstream it still holds true. Perhaps more true than before. I believe the background is related to the fact that Sir Rudyard's son had been killed in the meaningless morass of the Great War. The message is: we never learn. It's fairly long but it's elegant.
The Gods of the Copybook Headings As I pass through my incarnations in every age and race, We were living in trees when they met us. They showed us each in turn We moved as the Spirit listed. They never altered their pace, With the Hopes that our World is built on they were utterly out of touch When the Cambrian measures were forming They promised perpetual peace. On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all, * * * * * As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man -- |
The Modern Samurai Mindset makes a Samurai. Service to society. Author unknown |
Freedom Flies In Your heart Like An Eagle Dusty old helmet, rusty old gun, Audie Murphy, CMOH winner |
A Hunter's Half-life I'm a hunter; I've never been other. Joe Sledge |
|
Thomas Moore
Lay his sword by his side - it
hath served him too well* Fellow-labourers in life, let
them slumber in death, Yet pause - for, in fancy, a
still voice I hear, And it cries, from the grave
where the hero lies deep, "Should some alien,
unworthy such weapon to wield, But, if grasp'd by a hand that
hath learn'd the proud use * It was the custom of the ancient Irish, in the manner of the Scythians, to bury the favourite swords of their heroe along with them. |
|
Ode To The Media You media pansies may squeal and may squirm, To hell with you wimps from your Ivy League schools, You slick talkingheads may preach, preen and prattle, |
|
The Goblin
and the Raven A pretty little
raven went out walking late one night, But she tried to
take a short-cut down a street devoid of light, But the goblin saw
the raven, and with lust his heart was filled. So he stepped from
out the shadows dark, and with an evil sneer, The raven never
faltered, never altered, didn’t run, Said the raven to
the goblin, "When I do a thing it’s done right!" |
"What I Have Learned
From The Twentieth Century"
(With Thanks to
schoolmasters Josef Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Mao Tse-Tung and Pol
Pot for the Teaching.)
by Mike
Vanderboegh
Reflect upon these six lessons. Folks who wish to live free and prosperous in the next century would do well to understand the failures of the last.
Lesson No. 1
If a bureaucrat, or a soldier sent by a bureaucrat, comes to knock down your
door and take you someplace you don't want to go because of who you are or what
you think-- kill him. If you can, kill the politician who sent them. You will
likely die anyway, and you will be saving someone else the same fate. For it is
a universal truth that the intended victims always far outnumber the tyrant's
executioners. Any nation, which practices this lesson, will quickly run out of
executioners and tyrants, or they will run out of liberty.
Lesson No. 2
If a bureaucrat, or a soldier sent by a bureaucrat, comes to knock down your
door and confiscate your firearms-- kill him. The disarmament of law-abiding
citizens is the required precursor to genocide.
Lesson No. 3
If a bureaucrat tells you that he must know if you have a firearm, so he can put
your name on a list for the common good, or wants to issue you an identity card
so that you may be more easily identified-- tell him to go to hell. Registration
of people and firearms is the required precursor to the tyranny, which permits
genocide. Bureaucrats cannot send soldiers to doors that aren't on their list.
Lesson No. 4
Believe actions, not words. Tyrants are consummate liars. Just because a tyrant
is "democratically elected" doesn't mean that he believes in
democracy. Reference Adolf Hitler, 1932. And just because a would-be tyrant
mouths words of reverence to law and justice, or takes a solemn oath to uphold a
constitution, doesn't mean he believes such concepts apply to him.
Reference Bill Clinton, among others. The language of the lie is just another
tool of killers. A sign saying "Arbeit Macht Frei" (Work Makes You
Free) posted above an execution camp gate doesn't mean that anybody gets out of
there alive, and a room labeled "Showers" doesn't necessarily make you
clean. Bill Clinton notwithstanding, the meaning of "is" is plain when
such perverted language gets you killed. While all tyrants are liars, it is true
that not all political liars are would-be tyrants-- but they bear close
watching. And keep your rifle handy.
Lesson No. 5
Our constitutional republic as crafted by the Founders is the worst form of
government in the world, except when compared to all the others. Capitalism, as
well, is a terrible way to run an economy, except when compared to all other
economic systems. Unrestrained democracy is best expressed as two wolves and a
sheep sitting down to vote on what to have for dinner. The horrors of
collectivism in all its forms-- socialism, communism, national socialism,
fascism-- have been demonstrated beyond dispute by considerable wasteful trial
and bloody error. Ask the 200 million dead that collectivism brutally
slaughtered in this century. Leaders such as Bill Clinton who view the
Constitution as inconvenient and ignorable are harbingers of tyranny.
Lesson No. 6
While nations do not always get the leaders they deserve, they always get the
leaders they tolerate. And anyone who tells you that "It Can't Happen
Here" is whistling past the graveyard of history. There is no "house
rule" that bars tyranny coming to America. History is replete with
republics whose people grew complacent and descended into imperial butchery and
chaos. Dictators count on the assistance of people who are complacent, fearful,
envious, lazy and corrupt. While there is no "Collective guilt" to the
crimes of a regime (all such crimes being committed by specific criminal
individuals), there is certainly "collective
responsibility"--especially for those who watch the criminals at work
without objecting or interfering. A French journalist of the last century wrote
"I must speak out for I will not be an accomplice." Evil tyrants
require, indeed they depend upon, willing and unwilling accomplices-- good
people who would never think of harming a soul themselves. Lenin called such
people "useful idiots". DeTocqueville observed that "America is
great because America is good. When America ceases to be good, she will cease to
be great." As related in the Old Testament, God judged nations based upon
the immorality and criminality of their leaders. Entire peoples were scourged
because of their failure to remove corrupt leaders. As we move from the
Twentieth Century into the twenty-first, we should take care to remember the
ancient story of Sodom and Gomorrah. If we wish to avoid the butchery of the
Twentieth Century and the righteous judgment of the God of our antiquity, we
would do well to keep our Bibles, our Constitution and our firearms close at
hand.
The
Parable of the Sheep
© 1997
Charles
Riggs
Not
so long ago and in a pasture too uncomfortably close to here, a flock of sheep
lived and grazed. They were protected by a dog, who answered to the master, but
despite his best efforts from time to time a nearby pack of wolves would prey
upon the flock.
One day a group of sheep, bolder than the rest, met to discuss their dilemma. "Our dog is good, and vigilant, but he is one and the wolves are many. The wolves he catches are not always killed, and the master judges and releases many to prey again upon us, for no reason we can understand. What can we do? We are sheep, but we do not wish to be food, too!"
One sheep spoke up, saying "It is his teeth and claws that make the wolf so terrible to us. It is his nature to prey, and he would find any way to do it, but it is the tools he wields that make it possible. If we had such teeth, we could fight back, and stop this savagery." The other sheep clamored in agreement, and they went together to the old bones of the dead wolves heaped in the corner of the pasture, and gathered fang and claw and made them into weapons.
That night, when the wolves came, the newly armed sheep sprang up with their weapons and struck at them, crying, "Begone! We are not food!" and drove off the wolves, who were astonished. When did sheep become so bold and so dangerous to wolves? When did sheep grow teeth? It was unthinkable!
The next day, flush with victory and waving their weapons, they approached the flock to pronounce their discovery. But as they drew nigh, the flock huddled together and cried out, "Baaaaaaaadddd! Baaaaaddd things! You have bad things! We are afraid! You are not sheep!"
The brave sheep stopped, amazed. "But we are your brethren!" they cried. "We are still sheep, but we do not wish to be food. See, our new teeth and claws protect us and have saved us from slaughter. They do not make us into wolves, they make us equal to the wolves, and safe from their viciousness!"
"Baaaaaaad!" cried the flock, "the things are bad and will pervert you, and we fear them. You cannot bring them into the flock!" So the armed sheep resolved to conceal their weapons, for although they had no desire to panic the flock, they wished to remain in the fold. But they would not return to those nights of terror, waiting for the wolves to come.
In time, the wolves attacked less often and sought easier prey, for they had no stomach for fighting sheep who possessed tooth and claw even as they did. Not knowing which sheep had fangs and which did not, they came to leave sheep out of their diet almost completely except for the occasional raid, from which more than one wolf did not return.
Then came the day when, as the flock grazed beside the stream, one sheep’s weapon slipped from the folds of her fleece, and the flock cried out in terror again, "Baaaaaad! You still possess these evil things! We must ban you from our presence!"
And so they did. The great chief sheep and his council, encouraged by the words of their advisors, placed signs and totems at the edges of the pasture forbidding the presence of hidden weapons there. The armed sheep protested before the council, saying, "It is our pasture, too, and we have never harmed you! When can you say we have caused you hurt? It is the wolves, not we, who prey upon you. We are still sheep, but we are not food!" But the flock drowned them out with cries of "Baaaaaaddd! We will not hear your clever words! You and your things are evil and will harm us!"
Saddened by this rejection, the armed sheep moved off and spent their days on the edges of the flock, trying from time to time to speak with their brethren to convince them of the wisdom of having such teeth, but meeting with little success. They found it hard to talk to those who, upon hearing their words, would roll back their eyes and flee, crying "Baaaaddd! Bad things!"
That night, the wolves happened upon the sheep’s totems and signs, and said, "Truly, these sheep are fools! They have told us they have no teeth! Brothers, let us feed!" And they set upon the flock, and horrible was the carnage in the midst of the fold. The dog fought like a demon, and often seemed to be in two places at once, but even he could not halt the slaughter.
It was only when the other sheep arrived with their weapons that the wolves fled, only to remain on the edge of the pasture and wait for the next time they could prey, for if the sheep were so foolish once, they would be so again. This they did, and do still.
In the morning, the armed sheep spoke to the flock, and said, "See? If the wolves know you have no teeth, they will fall upon you. Why be prey? To be a sheep does not mean to be food for wolves!" But the flock cried out, more feebly for their voices were fewer, though with no less terror, "Baaaaaaaad! These things are bad! If they were banished, the wolves would not harm us! Baaaaaaad!"
So they resolved to retain their weapons, but to conceal them from the flock; to endure their fear and loathing, and even to protect their brethren if the need arose, until the day the flock learned to understand that as long as there were wolves in the night, sheep would need teeth to repel them.
They would still be sheep, but they would not be food!
Integrity
From a speech delivered by Gen. Charles C. Krulak,
27 January, 2000, at JSCOPE 2000
Integrity as we know it today, stands for soundness of moral principle and character - uprightness - honesty. Yet there is more. Integrity is also an ideal, a goal to strive for, and for a man or woman to "walk in their integrity" is to require constant discipline and usage. The word integrity itself is a martial word that comes to us from an ancient roman army tradition.
During the time of the 12 Caesars, the roman army would conduct morning inspections. As the inspecting centurion would come in front of each Legionnaire, the soldier would strike with his right fist the armor breastplate that covered his heart. The armor had to be strongest there in order to protect the heart from the sword thrusts and from arrow strikes. As the soldier struck his armor, he would shout "integritas", (in-teg'-ri-tas) which in Latin means material wholeness, completeness, and entirety. The inspecting centurion would listen closely for this affirmation and also for the ring that well kept armor would give off. Satisfied that the armor was sound and that the soldier beneath it was protected, he would then move on to the next man.
At about the same time, the Praetorians or imperial bodyguard were ascending into power and influence. Drawn from the best "politically correct" soldiers of the legions, they received the finest equipment and armor. They no longer had to shout "integritas" to signify that their armor was sound. Instead, as they struck their breastplate, they would shout "hail Caesar," to signify that their heart belonged to the imperial personage, not to their unit, not to an institution nor to a code of ideals. They armored themselves to serve the cause of a single man.
A century passed and the rift between the legion and the imperial bodyguard and its excesses grew larger. To signify the difference between the two organizations, the legionnaire, upon striking his armor would no longer shout "Integritas", but instead would shout "integer" (in'-te-ger). Integer means undiminished , complete, or perfect. It not only indicated that the armor was sound, it also indicated that the soldier wearing the armor was sound of character. He was complete in his integrity, his heart was in the right place and his standards and morals were high. He was not associated with the immoral conduct that was rapidly becoming the signature of the Praetorian guards.
The armor of integrity continued to serve the legion well. For over four centuries they held the line against the marauding goths and vandals but by 383 AD, the social decline that infected the republic and the Praetorian Guard had its effects upon the legion. As a 4th century roman general wrote, "when, because of negligence and laziness, parade ground drills were abandoned, the customary armor began to feel heavy since the soldiers rarely, if ever, wore it. Therefore, they first asked the emperor to set aside the breastplates and mail and then the helmets. So our soldiers fought the Goths without any protection for the heart and head and were often beaten by archers. Although there were many disasters, which lead to the loss of great cities, no one tried to restore the armor to the infantry. They took their armor off, and when the armor came off - so too came their integrity." It was only a matter of a few years until the legion rotted from within and was unable to hold the frontiers and the barbarians were at the gates.
Integrity is a combination of the words, "integritas" and "integer". It refers to the putting on of armor, of building a completeness, a wholeness, a wholeness in character. How appropriate that the word integrity is a derivative of two words describing the character of a member of the profession of arms. The military has a tradition of producing great leaders that possess the highest ethical standards and integrity. It produces men and women of character. Character that allows them to deal ethically with the challenges of today and to make conscious decisions about how they will approach tomorrow. However, as I mentioned earlier, this is not done instantly. It requires that integrity becomes a way of life. It must be woven into the very fabric of our soul. Just as was true in the days of Imperial Rome, you either walk in your integrity daily, or you take off the armor of the "integer" and leave your heart and soul exposed and open to attack.
My challenge to you is simple but often very difficult. Wear your armor of integrity, take full measure of its weight, find comfort in its protection and do not become lax. And always, always, remember that no one can take your integrity from you. You and only you can give it away! The biblical book of practical ethics , better known as the Book of Proverbs, sums it up very nicely "The integrity of the upright shall guide them but the perverseness of transgressors shall destroy them". (Proverbs 11:3)
|
The Monsters and the Weak The sun beat like a hammer, not a cloud was in the sky. He never turned his head or took his eye away from the
scope, A thunder clap a tongue of flame, the still abruptly
shattered; "Are you for real?" I asked in awe. "You
don't want fame or credit?" "As bad as all this is though, it could be a whole
lot worse." "So you can keep your trophies and your fleeting
bit of fame. "You tell them what it means to folks here just to
speak their mind, |
|
I WILL FIGHT Fought for power, fought for glory Fought for avarice and ego, Fought from horseback and from camels, Fought with spears and with missiles, Marched with Caesar and Pizarro, Stormed a hundred bloody beaches, Conquered Incas and Apaches, Lost to Shaka and to Rommel, Yet through those years and struggles For I came to love the battle From the Tigris and Euphretes As a sniper or a lancer, I have been a kamikaze My cause was war itself, you see, The clash of arms around me, I have killed two hundred thousand And then, one dreary battle dawn, For I thought upon my hist'ry, The names across the centuries With Spartacus and Charlie Call me rebel, call me traitor, January 2, 1998 |
|
THE OLD MAN NEXT
DOOR Hey little boy with the ball and the bat, Now he sits in his garden with flowers and ants, He leapt into space with a cork-blackened face Or…did he starve in the jungle, in the steaming
green hell Hey little boy, pull over your bike, Seeing his brothers by the hundreds die – Did he dive from the sun in a P-51 Did he fly all alone over the vast Pacific blue, Hey little boy, do you see that he limps? Or was it the cold in a winter of old Or was it Korea, holding off a defeat Hey little boy on your way to the store - Hey little boy, take pause in your plans Hey little boy, do you KNOW the old man next door? |
WHY THE GUN IS
CIVILIZATION
By Marko Kloos
"Human beings only have two ways to deal with one another reason and force. If you want me to do something for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or force me to do your bidding under threat of force. Every human interaction falls into one of those two categories, without exception. Reason or force, that's it.
In a truly moral and civilized society, people exclusively interact through persuasion. Force has no place as a valid method of social interaction and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some.
When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force. You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employment of force. The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound mugger, a 75-year old retiree on equal footing with a 19-year old gang banger, and a single gay guy on equal footing with a carload of drunk guys with baseball bats. The gun removes the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a defender.
There are plenty of people who consider the gun as the source of bad force equations. These are the people who think that we'd be more civilized if all guns were removed from society, because a firearm makes it easier for a mugger to do his job. That, of course, is only true if the mugger's potential victims are mostly disarmed either by choice or by legislative fiat--it has no validity when most of a mugger's potential marks are armed. People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that's the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly.
Then there's the argument that the gun makes confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result in injury. This argument is fallacious in several ways. Without guns involved, confrontations are won by the physically superior party inflicting overwhelming injury on the loser. People who think that fists, bats, sticks, or stones don't constitute lethal force watch too much TV, where people take beatings and come out of it with a bloody lip at worst. The fact that the gun makes lethal force easier works solely in favor of the weaker defender, not the stronger attacker. If both are armed, the field is level. The gun is the only weapon that's as lethal in the hands of an octogenarian as it is in the hands of a weightlifter. It simply wouldn't work as well as a force equalizer if it wasn't both lethal and easily employable.
When I carry a gun, I don't do so because I am looking for a fight, but because I'm looking to be left alone. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced only persuaded. I don't carry it because I'm afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn't limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force. It removes force from the equation...and that's why carrying a gun is a civilized act."
Please email comments to Fr. Frog by clicking here.
| Back to Fr. Frog's Home Page |
Updated 2008-08-19